<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scams. You just gotta love them.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=15" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=15</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 08:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ze titel of ze blog &#187; Astrology and Other Hash Functions for the Masses</title>
		<link>http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=15#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Ze titel of ze blog &#187; Astrology and Other Hash Functions for the Masses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=15#comment-961</guid>
		<description>[...] The important feature of the astrological hash functions is not avoiding collisions. On the contrary, they WANT to have many people in the same category (so they can sell them &#8217;special&#8217; jewellery, etc). No, the best feature is that the algorithm for calculating them is known to the sca&#8230; practicioners , and whomever of them you visit for a second oppinion (as a layman&#8217;s scientific test) he would arrive at the same predictions as the first one. Obivously, as the two haven&#8217;t met (or didn&#8217;t have time to, or live 1000km apart), their &#8217;science&#8217; must be correct! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The important feature of the astrological hash functions is not avoiding collisions. On the contrary, they WANT to have many people in the same category (so they can sell them &#8217;special&#8217; jewellery, etc). No, the best feature is that the algorithm for calculating them is known to the sca&#8230; practicioners , and whomever of them you visit for a second oppinion (as a layman&#8217;s scientific test) he would arrive at the same predictions as the first one. Obivously, as the two haven&#8217;t met (or didn&#8217;t have time to, or live 1000km apart), their &#8217;science&#8217; must be correct! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
