Comments on: Beauty is in the Photoshop of the Beholder http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88 Tue, 05 May 2026 23:29:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: James http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-148441 James Mon, 12 Mar 2018 06:27:05 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-148441 plus offering extras which can announce this kind of the main benefit of the skepticism. plus offering extras which can announce this kind of the main benefit of the skepticism.

]]> By: EMMA http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-9251 EMMA Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:45:51 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-9251 errrrr dat is fucking minging what they are doing to those poor animals its distgusting their hould be a betta way of testing costmetics than doin it too poor animals errrrr dat is fucking minging what they are doing to those poor animals its distgusting their hould be a betta way of testing costmetics than doin it too poor animals

]]> By: Hannah http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-9250 Hannah Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:43:26 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-9250 How teh fok can they do this to animals! cheeky priks! How teh fok can they do this to animals! cheeky priks!

]]> By: Mordred http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6378 Mordred Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:58:56 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6378 And here's PETA's list of companies that do/don't test on animals: <a href="http://www.caringconsumer.com/resources_companies.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.caringconsumer.com/resources_companies.asp</a> And here’s PETA’s list of companies that do/don’t test on animals:
http://www.caringconsumer.com/resources_companies.asp

]]> By: Mordred http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6376 Mordred Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:22:14 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6376 As I understood how cosmetic testing is done, animal testing can be (oversimplifying here) replaced by human work over the microscope. There is no reason this shouldn't be done with whatever color cosmetics as well. Animals are being replaced as a research item in other areas as well, there are several "virtual animals" available for dissection studies on a computer. Also, testing medicine on animals is maybe not very viable, as they have different biochemical mechanisms than a human patient. I don't think that leaves many valid non-food related uses of animals. > I would like to be made photoshop beautiful, at least once:D No you don't, that's just your social programming speaking :) As I understood how cosmetic testing is done, animal testing can be (oversimplifying here) replaced by human work over the microscope. There is no reason this shouldn’t be done with whatever color cosmetics as well.
Animals are being replaced as a research item in other areas as well, there are several “virtual animals” available for dissection studies on a computer. Also, testing medicine on animals is maybe not very viable, as they have different biochemical mechanisms than a human patient. I don’t think that leaves many valid non-food related uses of animals.

> I would like to be made photoshop beautiful, at least once:D
No you don’t, that’s just your social programming speaking :)

]]> By: haz http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6370 haz Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:54:17 +0000 http://mordred.niama.net/blog/?p=88#comment-6370 Nasty, huh:/ I agree on drawing the line on cosmetics. However, it's a fuzzy line because 'white cosmetics' (night creams, lotions, etc.) may be said to be health products. Off: I would like to be made photoshop beautiful, at least once:D Nasty, huh:/
I agree on drawing the line on cosmetics. However, it’s a fuzzy line because ‘white cosmetics’ (night creams, lotions, etc.) may be said to be health products.

Off: I would like to be made photoshop beautiful, at least once:D

]]>